Sunday, August 29, 2004
9/11 Commission Report Criticism
Two views, one in the NYT's Book Review and the other by Jeff Jarvis, on how the report is flawed that are worth reading, especially because they are much more informed about the process that was used to construct the report than I am.
Despite the flaws they point out, though, I still think the historical narrative is useful, although a non-political look by an historian will of course be more enlightening.
Despite the flaws they point out, though, I still think the historical narrative is useful, although a non-political look by an historian will of course be more enlightening.
Comments:
Post a Comment
